Observando a los observadores: Cómo la certificación de la calidad de la observación electoral internacional puede mejorar la disuasión del fraude electoral

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22529/

Palabras clave:

fraude electoral, misiones internacionales de observación electoral, disuasión del fraude, promoción de la democracia, certificación de calidad

Resumen

El fraude electoral es un delito muy extendido, cuyas ramificaciones afectan a los derechos humanos, a la democracia y a la rendición de cuentas. Numerosas misiones de observación se han organizado desde los años 60 para prevenir el fraude electoral. A pesar de la mejora sistemática de las misiones y sus numerosas ventajas, el carácter descentralizado de la observación electoral ha dado lugar a la coexistencia de misiones de observación profesionales y no profesionales o pseudo-misiones de observación. Estas misiones no profesionales evitan las mejores prácticas en la materia y diluyen el potencial preventivo de las misiones propiamente dichas. Este trabajo examina cómo puede mejorarse la observación electoral internacional para eliminar los incentivos a las misiones no profesionales. Tras analizar evidencia empírica y limitaciones, este trabajo propone la creación de una agencia internacional de certificación de misiones que ayude a hacer cumplir los estándares y las mejores prácticas entre las organizaciones de observación. 

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

  • Matías Caro, Universidad Católica de Córdoba
    Catholic University of Cordoba, Faculty of Law and Social Sciences, Argentina.

Referencias

AFRICAN UNION. (2013). Election observation manual. African Union Commission.

ALVAREZ, R. M., HALL, T. E. & HYDE, S. D. (Eds.) (2009). Election fraud: detecting and deterring electoral manipulation. Brookings Institution Press.

ASUNKA, J., BRIERLEY, S., GOLDEN, M., KRAMON, E. & OFOSU, G. (2019). Electoral fraud or violence: The effect of observers on party manipulation strategies. British Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 129-151. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123416000491

BADER, M. (2013). Crowdsourcing election monitoring in the 2011–2012 Russian elections. East European Politics, 29(4), 521-535. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2013.818979

BADER, J. (2014). China’s foreign relations and the survival of autocracies. Routledge.

BADER, J., GRÄVINGHOLT, J. & KÄSTNER, A. (2010). Would autocracies promote autocracy? A political economy perspective on regime-type export in regional neighbourhoods. Contemporary Politics, 16(1), 81-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569771003593904

BAILEY, D. (2009). Caught in the Act: Recent Federal Election Fraud Cases. In R. M. Alvarez, T. E. Hall and S. D. Hyde (Eds.) (2009). Election fraud: detecting and deterring electoral manipulation (pp. 102-111). Brookings Institution Press.

BEAULIEU, E. & HYDE, S. D. (2009). In the shadow of democracy promotion: Strategic manipulation, international observers, and election boycotts. Comparative Political Studies, 42(3), 392-415. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414008325571

BEBER, B. & SCACCO, A. (2012). What the numbers say: A digit-based test for election fraud. Political analysis, 20(2), 211-234. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mps003

BECKER, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169-217.

BIRCH, S. (2007). Electoral systems and electoral misconduct. Comparative Political Studies, 40(12), 1533-1556. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006292886

BIRCH, S. (2011). Electoral malpractice. Oxford University Press.

BJORNLUND, E. (2004). Beyond free and fair: Monitoring elections and building democracy. Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

BRUSCO, V., NAZARENO, M. & STOKES, S. C. (2004). Vote buying in Argentina. Latin American research review, 9(2), 66-88.

BUZIN, A., BRONDUM, K. & ROBERTSON, G. (2016). Election observer effects: A field experiment in the Russian Duma election of (2011). Electoral Studies, 44, 184-191.

CALLEN, M. & LONG, J. D. (2015). Institutional corruption and election fraud: Evidence from a field experiment in Afghanistan. American Economic Review, 105(1), 354-81.http://doi.org/10.3886/E112875V1

CAROTHERS, T. (1997). The rise of election monitoring: The observers observed. Journal of Democracy, 8(3), 17-31.

CASAS, A., DÍAZ, G. & TRINDADE, A. (2017). Who monitors the monitor? Effect of party observers on electoral outcomes. Journal of Public Economics, 145, 136-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.11.015

CLARKE, R. V. (1995). Situational crime prevention. Crime and justice, 19, 91-150.

Cotelo, C. (2017). Betanzos, espello electoral de España. RIPS: Revista de Investigaciones Políticas y Sociológicas, 16(2), 187-202.

DAXECKER, U. E. (2012). The cost of exposing cheating: International election monitoring, fraud, and post-election violence in Africa. Journal of Peace Research, 49(4), 503-516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343312445649

DAXECKER, U. E. (2014). All quiet on election day? International election observation and incentives for pre-election violence in African elections. Electoral Studies, 34, 232-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.11.006

DAXECKER, U. & SCHNEIDER, G. (2014). Electoral observers: The implications of multiple monitors for electoral integrity. In P. Norris, R. W. Frank and F. M. I Coma (Eds.), Advancing electoral integrity (pp. 73-93). Oxford University Press.

DUNN, W. N. (2015). Public policy analysis. Routledge.

ENIKOLOPOV, R., KOROVKIN, V., PETROVA, M., SONIN, K. & ZAKHAROV, A. (2013). Field experiment estimate of electoral fraud in Russian parliamentary elections. Proceedings f the National Academy of Sciences, 110(2), 448-452. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1206770110

ELKLIT, J. & REYNOLDS, A. (2005). A framework for the systematic study of election quality. Democratization, 12(2), 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340500069204

ELKLIT, J. & SVENSSON, P. (1997). The rise of election monitoring: What makes elections free and fair? Journal of democracy, 8(3), 32-46.

ESCOBARI, D. & HOOVER, G. A. (2020). Evo Morales and electoral fraud in Bolivia: a natural experiment and discontinuity evidence. [Online]. [Accessed 26 July 2022]. www.cepr.net/images/stories/reports/escobari_and_hoover_original.pdf

EVANS, M. (2019). International policy transfer: Between the global and sovereign and between the global and local. In D. Stone & K. Moloney (Eds.) (2019). The Oxford handbook of global policy and transnational administration. Oxford University Press, Section 6.

FOUCAULT, M. (2000). Vigilar y castigar: nacimiento de la prisión. Siglo XXI.

FUKUMOTO, K. & HORIUCHI, Y. (2011). Making outsiders’ votes count: Detecting electoral fraud through a natural experiment. American Political Science Review, 105(3), 586-603. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000268

GARBER, L. (1984). Guidelines for International Election Observing. International Human Rights Law Group.

GARBER, L. & COWAN, G. (1993). The virtues of parallel vote tabulations. Journal of Democracy, 4(2), 95-107.

GEISLER, G. (1993). Fair? What has fairness got to do with it? Vagaries of election observations and democratic standards. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 31(4), 613-637.

HORCASITAS, R. P. (1997). La observación electoral: una modalidad de la militancia ciudadana. Revista Mexicana de Sociología, 59(2), 23-40.

HYDE, S. D. (2007). The observer effect in international politics: Evidence from a natural experiment. World politics, 60(1), 37-63.

HYDE, S. D. (2010). Experimenting in democracy promotion: international observers and the 2004 presidential elections in Indonesia. Perspectives on Politics, 8(2), 511-527. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592710001222

HYDE, S. D. (2011a). Catch us if you can: Election monitoring and international norm diffusion. American Journal of Political Science, 55(2), 356-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00508.x

HYDE, S. D. (2011b). The pseudo-democrat’s dilemma: why election observation became an international norm. Cornell University Press.

HYDE, S. D. & MARINOV, N. (2012). Which elections can be lost?. Political analysis, 20(2), 191-210. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr040

HYDE, S. D. & MARINOV, N. (2014). Information and self-enforcing democracy: The role of international election observation. International Organization, 68(2), 329-359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020818313000465

HYDE, S. D. & O’MAHONY, A. (2010). International scrutiny and pre-electoral fiscal manipulation in developing countries. The Journal of Politics, 72(3), 690-704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022381610000101

ICHINO, N. & SCHÜNDELN, M. (2012). Deterring or displacing electoral irregularities? Spillover effects of observers in a randomized field experiment in Ghana. The Journal of Politics, 74(1), 292-307. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381611001368

KELLEY, J. (2008a). Assessing the complex evolution of norms: the rise of international election monitoring. International Organization, 62(2), 221-255. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818308080089

KELLEY, J. (2008b). The more the merrier? The effects of having multiple international election monitoring organizations. Perspectives on Politics, 7(1), 59-64. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592709090094

KELLEY, J. (2009). D-minus elections: The politics and norms of international election observation. International Organization, 63(4), 765-787. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818309990117

KELLEY, J. G. (2012). Monitoring Democracy: When International Election Observation Works, and Why It Often Fails. Princeton University Press.

KLIMEK, P., YEGOROV, Y., HANEL, R. & THURNER, S. (2012). Statistical detection of systematic election irregularities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(41), 16469-16473. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1210722109

KNACK, S. (2004). Does foreign aid promote democracy? International studies quarterly, 48(1), 251-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-8833.2004.00299.x

LEEMANN, L. & BOCHSLER, D. (2014). A systematic approach to study electoral fraud. Electoral Studies, 35, 33-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2014.03.005

LEEFFERS, S. & VICENTE, P. C. (2019). Does electoral observation influence electoral results? Experimental evidence for domestic and international observers in Mozambique. World Development, 114, 42-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.09.021

LEHOUCQ, F. (2003). Electoral fraud: Causes, types, and consequences. Annual review of political science, 6(1), 233-256. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085655

LEHOUCQ, F. E. & MOLINA, I. (2002). Stuffing the ballot box: fraud, electoral reform, and democratization in Costa Rica. Cambridge University Press.

LITTLE, A. T. (2012). Elections, fraud, and election monitoring in the shadow of revolution. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 7(3), 249-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/100.00011078

MAGALONI, B. (2010). The game of electoral fraud and the ousting of authoritarian rule. American journal of political science, 54(3), 751-765. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00458.x

MAZEROLLE, L. & RANSLEY, J. (2006). Third party policing. Cambridge University Press.

MEBANE, W. R. & KALININ, K. (2009). Comparative election fraud detection. [Online]. [Accessed 26 July 2022]. https://papers.ssrn.com/Sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1450078

MOLINA, I. & LEHOUCQ, F. E. (1999). Political competition and electoral fraud: A Latin American case study. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 30(2), 199-234.

MUÑOZ-POGOSSIAN, B. & VELOSO, D. Á. (2015). La responsabilidad de observar: Repensando la observación electoral de la OEA. América Latina Hoy, 70, 55-76. https://doi.org/10.14201/alh2015705576

MURISON, J. (2013). Judicial politics: election petitions and electoral fraud in Uganda. Journal of Eastern African Studies, 7(3), 492-508. https://doi.org/10.1080/17531055.2013.811026

NEVITTE, N. & CANTON, S. A. (1997). The rise of election monitoring: the role of domestic observers. Journal of Democracy, 8(3), 47-61.

Organization of American States [OAS]. (2007). Methods for Election Observation: A Manual for OAS Electoral Observation Missions. OAS.

Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe [OSCE]. (2010). Election Observation Handbook. OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR).

PLANCHUELO, V. C. P. (2017). La ‘observación’ electoral de la OEA vs. el ‘acompañamiento’ de UNASUR en las recientes elecciones de Venezuela. América Latina Hoy, 75, 127- 148. https://doi.org/10.14201/alh201775127148

RATCLIFFE, J. H., TAYLOR, R. B., ASKEY, A. P., THOMAS, K., GRASSO, J., BETHEL, K. J. & KOEHNLEIN, J. (2020). The Philadelphia predictive policing experiment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 17, 15-41.

ROUSSIAS, N. & RUIZ-RUFINO, R. (2018). “Tying incumbents’ hands”: The effects of election monitoring on electoral outcomes. Electoral Studies, 54, 116-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2018.05.005

RUNDLETT, A. & SVOLIK, M. W. (2016). Deliver the vote! micromotives and macrobehavior in electoral fraud. American Political Science Review, 110(1), 180-197.

SCHAFFER, F. C. (Ed.) (2007). Elections for sale: The causes and consequences of vote buying. Lynne Rienner Publishers.

SCHEDLER, A. (2002). Elections without democracy: The menu of manipulation. Journal of democracy, 13(2), 36-50.

SHERMAN, L. W., MACKENZIE, D. L., FARRINGTON, D. P. AND WELSH, B. C. (Eds.) (2002). Evidence-based crime prevention. Routledge.

SIMPSER, A. (2005). Making votes not count: Strategic incentives for electoral corruption. Stanford University.

SIMPSER, A. AND DONNO, D. (2012). Can international election monitoring harm governance? The Journal of Politics, 74(2), 501-513. DOI: 10.1017/S002238161100168X

SJOBERG, F. M. (2012). Making voters count: Evidence from field experiments about the efficacy of domestic election observation. [Online]. Columbia University Harriman Institute. [Accessed 26 July 2022]. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2133592

SKOVORODA, R. AND LANKINA, T. (2017). Fabricating votes for Putin: new tests of fraud and electoral manipulations from Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs, 33(2), 100-123.

TUCKER, J. A. (2007). Enough! Electoral fraud, collective action problems, and post-communist colored revolutions. Perspectives on politics, 5(3), 535-551. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592707071538

UNITED NATIONS. (10 December 1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Resolution n° 217). https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights

UNITED NATIONS. (16 December 1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Resolution 2[200A (XXI)]). un-ilibrary.org/content/books/9789210594660s003-c008/read.

UNITED NATIONS. (2005). Declaration of Principles for International Election Observation and Code of Conduct for International Election Observers. United Nations. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime [UNODC]. (2015). International classification of crime for statistical purposes.

VICENTE, P. C. (2014). Is vote buying effective? Evidence from a field experiment in West Africa. The Economic Journal, 124(574), 356-387.

VIGNA, A. (2010). The parody of Electoral observation. NACLA Report on the Americas, 43(2), 14-16.

Vlăsceanu, l., GrünberG, l. & Pârlea, D. (2004). Quality assurance and accreditation: A glossary of basic terms and definitions. Unesco-Cepes.

WANTCHEKON, L. (2003). Clientelism and voting behavior: Evidence from a field experiment in Benin. World politics, 55(3), 399-422. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2003.0018

WEISBURD, D. AND ECK, J. E. (2004). What can police do to reduce crime, disorder, and fear?. The annals of the American academy of political and social science, 593(1), 42-65.

Archivos adicionales

Publicado

2024-12-10

Número

Sección

Artículos

Cómo citar

Observando a los observadores: Cómo la certificación de la calidad de la observación electoral internacional puede mejorar la disuasión del fraude electoral. (2024). Studia Politicæ, 62, 31-57. https://doi.org/10.22529/

Artículos similares

1-10 de 46

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>