ODonnell and the Study of Latin American Politics After the Transitions.

Autores/as

  • Sebastián Mazzuca

Palabras clave:

Régimen político – Democracia – Patrimonialismo – América Latina

Resumen

El artículo define y muestra las conexiones entre los conceptos fundamentales del análisis de regímenes políticos, desde Schumpeter a Linz. El análisis provee el contexto para resaltar cambios y continuidades en el trabajo que Guillermo ODonnell dedicó a la política post-transicional,incluidas las nociones de democracia delegativa, zonas marrones e instituciones informales. El texto plantea que si estas nociones son combinadas con la sociología política de Max Weber, el último trabajo de ODonnell en realidad implica una ruptura con el paradigma de la democratización. Su trabajo dejó de centrarse en cuestiones de acceso alpoder y pasó implícitamente a estudiar cuestiones de ejercicio del poder.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

ALVAREZ, Michael; José Antonio CHEIBUB; Fernando LIMONGI and Adam PRZEWORSKI

(1996). Classifying Political Regimes. Studies in Comparative International Development, 31, 2, pp. 3-36.

ALMOND, Gabriel (1956). Comparative Political Systems. In HANS, Eulau, ed., Political Behavior, Glencoe, IL: Free Press, pp. 35-42.

COLLIER, David, ed. (1979). The New Authoritarianism in Latin America. Princeton, NJ:

Princeton University Press.

COLLIER, David and Steven LEVITSKY (1997). Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual

Innovation in Comparative Research. World Politics, 49, April, pp. 430-451.

COLLIER, Ruth (2000). Democratic Transition. In Paul Barry CLARK y Joe FOWERAKER, eds., Encyclopedia of Democratic Thought, London: Routledge (forthcoming).

DAHL, Robert (1956). A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

DAHL, Robert (1971). Polyarchy. New Haven, CO: Yale University Press.

(1979). Procedural Democracy. In Peter LASLETT and James FISHKIN, eds.,

Philosophy, Politics, and Society. New Haven, CO: Yale University Press, pp.

-133.

(1989). Democracy and its Critics. New Haven, CO: Yale University Press.

DIAMOND, Larry Jay; Juan J. LINZ and Seymour Martin LIPSET (1990). Politics in Developing Countries: Comparing Experiences with Democracy. Boulder, CO: L. Rienner

Publishers.

DI PALMA, Giuseppe (1990). To Craft Democracies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

FREEDEN, Michael (1996). Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach.

Oxford: Clarendon Press.

GALLIE, W. B. (1956). Essentially Contested Concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56. London: Harrison & Sons: pp. 167-198.

HELD, David (1987). Models of Democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

HINTZE, O. (1970). Staat und Verfassung: Gesammelte Abhandlungen zur Algemeinen

Verfassungsgeschichte. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

HUNTINGTON, Samuel (1989). The Modest Meaning of Democracy. In Robert PASTOR,

ed., Democracy in the Americas: Stopping the Pendulum. New York, NY: Holmes &

Meier, pp. 11-28.

(1991). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

JESSOP, B. (1977). Recent developments in Marxist theories of the capitalist state.

Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1, pp. 353-373.

KARL, Terry (1990). Dilemmas of Democratization in Latin America. Comparative

Politics, 23.

LINZ, Juan (1964). An Authoritarian Regime: Spain. In Erik ALLARDT and Yrjö LITTUNEN, eds., Cleavages, Ideologies, and Party Systems. Helsinki: The Academic Bookstore, pp. 291-341.

(1975). Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. In Fred GREENSTEIN and Nelson POLSBY, eds., Handbook of Political Science, 3. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley,

pp. 175-411.

(1978). The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Crisis, Breakdown and Reequilibration, volume 1 of Juan LINZ and Alfred STEPAN, eds., The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

LIPSET, Seymour M. (1959). Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy, American Political Science Review, 53, March, pp.

-105.

(1963). Political Man, Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company, Inc.

MARSHALL, T. H. (1992). Citizenship and Social Class. London: Pluto Press.

MUNCK, Gerardo (1994). Democratic Transitions in Comparative Perspective. Comparative Politics, 26, 3, pp. 355-375.

ODONNELL, Guillermo (1973). Modernization and Bureaucratic Authoritarianism. Berkeley: University of California Press.

(1979). Notas para el Estudio de Procesos de Democratización a partir del Estado Burocrático-Autoritario. Estudios CEDES, 2, 5, Buenos Aires.

(1993/1999a). On the State, Democratization and Some Conceptual Problems:

A Latin American View with Glances at Some Postcommunist Countries, World Development, 21, 8, pp. 13551369.

(1994/1999a).Delegative Democracy, Journal of Democracy, 5, 1, pp. 55-69.

(1996/1999a). Illusions about Consolidation, Journal of Democracy, 7, 2, pp.

-51.

ODONNELL, Guillermo (1999a). Counterpoints. Selected Essays on Authoritarianism

and Democratization. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

(1999b). Horizontal Accountability and New Polyarchies. In Andreas SCHEDLER; Larry DIAMOND, and Mark PLATTNER, eds., The Self-Restraining State:

Power and Accountability in New Democracies. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp.

-52.

(1999c). Polyarchies and the (Un)Rule of Law in Latin America. In Juan MÉNDEZ; Guillermo ODONNELL, and Paulo Segio PINHEIRO, eds., The (Un)Rule of Law

and the Underprivileged in Latin America. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre

Dame Press.

ODONNELL, Guillermo and Philippe SCHMITTER (1986). Tentative Conclusions about

Uncertain Democracies, volume 4 of Guillermo ODONNELL, Philippe SCHMITTER

and Laurence WHITEHEAD, eds., Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. Baltimore: The

John Hopkins University Press.

PRIDHAM, Geoffrey (1995). Transitions to Democracy. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth Publishing Company.

PRZEWORSKI, Adamv (1991). Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University

Press.

RUESCHEMEYER, Dietrich; Evelyn Huber STEPHENS, and John D. STEPHENS (1992). Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

RUSTOW, Dankwart (1970). Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model.

Comparative Politics, 3, pp. 337-363.

SARTORI, Giovanni (1987). The Theory of Democracy Revisited. Chatham, NJ: Chatham

House Publishers.

SCHUMPETER, Joseph A. (1947). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: NY:

Harper & Row Publishers.

SHAPIRO, Ian. (1989). Gross Concepts in Political Argument. Political Theory, 17, 1,

pp. 51-71.

SHEFTER, M. (1977). Party and patronage: Germany, England, and Italy. Politics and

Society, 7, pp. 403-451.

SIN, Don Chull. On The Third Wave of Democratization. World Politics, 47, pp.

-170.

TILLY, Charles (1975). Reflections on the History of European State-Making. In Charles TILLY, ed., The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton, NJ:

Princeton University Press.

WEBER, Max (1978). Economy and Society. Berkeley, CA: University of Califor9nia Press

Publicado

2014-02-10

Número

Sección

Artículos

Cómo citar

O’Donnell and the Study of Latin American Politics After the Transitions. (2014). Studia Politicæ, 26, 99 - 125p. https://revistas.bibdigital.uccor.edu.ar/index.php/SP/article/view/557

Artículos similares

1-10 de 157

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>