De exportadores e imitadores. Una revisión crítica de la literatura sobre la difusión internacional de modelos de reforma en la administración pública
Resumen
Este trabajo realiza una presentación amplia y sistemática de las perspectivas teóricas sobre la transferencia internacional de modelos de reforma del Estado en general, y del modelo de Nueva Gestión Pública en particular. La discusión se organiza en tres ejes: primero, el contenido de lo que se transfiere, es decir, cómo se estructuran los modelos de reforma; segundo, los principales mecanismos y actores de la transferencia de reformas; tercero, el lugar de la política como variable explicativa de estos procesos. Finalmente se proponen ejes específicos para estructurar una agenda de investigación sobre la temática abordada, especialmente en el contexto de la reforma del Estado en los países de América Latina a partir de los años ’90.Descargas
Referencias
AUCOIN, P. (1990). Administrative Reform in Public Management: paradigms,
principles, paradoxes and pendulums, in Governance: an international
journal of policy and administration, Vol. 3, Nº 2, April.
BANCO MUNDIAL (1997). El Estado en un Mundo en Transformación. Informe sobre el Desarrollo Mundial 1997. Washington D.C., Banco Mundial.
BRESSER PEREIRA, Luiz Carlos (1995). Development economics and the
World Banks identity crisis, Review of International Political Economy,
:2, Spring, pp. 211-247.
BURKI, Shahid y PERRY, Guillermo (1998). Beyond the Washington consensus: institutions matter. Washington D.C., World Bank.
BURKI, Shahid Javed y PERRY, Guillermo E. (1997), The Long March: a reform agenda for Latin America and the Caribbean in the next decade.
World Bank Latin America and Caribbean Studies, View Points, Washington D.C., World Bank.
CLARK, J. (1985). Policy diffusion and program scope, Publius, 15, pp. 61-70.
CHRISTENSEN, Tom and LAEIGREID, Per (2001a). A transformative perspective on
administrative reforms, in CHRISTENSEN, Tom and LAEIGREID, Per (dir.). New
Public Management. The transformation of ideas and practices. Ashgate.
CHRISTENSEN, Tom and LAEIGREID, Per (2001b). Introduction, in CHRISTENSEN, Tom and LAEIGREID, Per (dir.). New Public Management. The transformation of ideas and practices. Ashgate.
CORBALÁN, María Alejandra (2002). El Banco Mundial, intervención y disciplinamiento: el caso argentino, enseñanzas para América Latina. Buenos Aires, Editorial Biblos.
DIMAGGIO, Paul and POWELL, Walter (1991). The iron cage revisited: institucional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizacional fields,
in POWELL, Walter and DIMAGGIO, Paul (eds.). The new institutionalism in
organizacional análisis. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
DIMITRIKAPOULOS, Dionyssis and PASSAS, Argyris (2003). International Organizations and Domestic Administrative Reform, in PETERS, B. Guy and PIERRE,
Jon (Eds). Handbook of Public Administration. London, Sage Publications.
DIXON, Keith (1998). Les évangélistes du marché. Paris: Raisons dAgir Editions.
DJELIC, Marie-Laure (1998). Exporting the American model. The post-war
transformation of European business. Oxford University Press.
DOLOWITZ, David and MARSH, David (1996). Who learns what from whom: a review of the policy transfer literature, in Political Studies, XLIV, pp. 343-357.
DUNLEAVY, Patrick (1997). The globalisation of public services production:
can government be Best in world?, in MASSEY, Andrew (Ed.). Globalization and marketization of government services. Comparing contemporary public sector developments. University of Portsmouth Press.
GOW, James Ian et DUFOUR, Caroline (2000). Le nouveau management public est-il un paradigme? Cela a-t-il de limportance?, Revue Internationale des Sciences Administratifs, Nº 4.
GREEN COWLES, Maria; CAPORASO, James and RISSE, Thomas (2001). Transforming Europe. Europeanization and domestic change. Cornell University Press.
GUIÑAZÚ, María Clelia (2002). Estado y Reforma en las nuevas recomendaciones del Banco Mundial: conceptos y teorias, en Política y Gestión.
Rosario, Homo Sapiens Ediciones.
HALL, Peter y TAYLOR, Rosemary (1996). Political Science and the Three
New Institutionalisms, Political Studies, XLIV.
HALL, Peter (1993). Policy paradigms, social lerning, and the state : The case
of economic policymaking in Britain, in Comparative Politics, v.25, N. 3
HALL, Peter A. (Ed.) (1989). The political power of economic ideas: keynesianism across nations. Princeton NJ, Princeton University Press.
HIRSCHMAN, Albert O. (1989). How the Keynesian revolution was exported
from the United States, and other comments, in HALL, Peter A. (Ed.),
The political power of economic ideas: keynesianism across nations. Princeton NJ, Princeton University Press.
HOESER, Utz (2004). Creating development projects as to match the funds
available for their completion: the paradox of Multilateral Development
Banks, manuscript
. (1998). A la recherche de projets. Laction aveugle des banques de
développement, Thèse Doctoral, Institut dEtudes Politiques de Paris.
HOGGETT, Paul (1996). New modes of control in the public service, in Public Administration, Vol. 74, Spring, pp. 9-32.
HOOD, Christopher (1991). A public management for all seasons?, in Public Administration, Vol. 69, Spring, pp. 3-19.
. (1998). The art of the state. Culture, rhetoric and public management. Oxford University Press.
INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK (1996). Frame of reference for Bank
action in programs for modernization of the State and strengthening of
civil society. Washington D.C.: Strategic Planning and Operational Policy
Department, IADB.
JACOBY, Wade (2001). Tutors and Pupils: International organizations, central
European elites, and western models, in Governance: an international
journal of policy and administration, Vol. 14, Nº 2, April, pp. 169-200.
. (2000). Imitation and Politics. Redesigning Modern Germany. Ithaca-New York, Cornell University Press.
JACOBSON, Bengt; LAEGREID, Per and PEDERSEN, Ove (2004). Europeanization
and transnational states: comparing Nordic central governments. London, Routledge.
JAMES, Oliver (2001). Business Models and the transfer of businesslike central government agencies, in Governance: an international journal of
policy and administration, Vol. 14, Nº 2, April, pp. 233-252.
KERAUDREN, Philippe (1999). Entre Nouveau Management Public et Gouvernance: Les spécificités de la reforme de ladministration centrale en GrandeBretagne, revue Politique et Management Public, Volume 17, Nº 1, mars.
KUHN, Thomas (1996). La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. Buenos
Aires: Breviarios del Fondo de Cultura Económica.
MAJONE, Giandomenico (1996). Public policy and administration : ideas, interest and institutions, dans GOODIN, Robert et KLINGENMAN (ed.), A new
handbook of Political Science. Nueva York, Oxford University Press.
MARCH, James G. and OLSEN, Johan P. (1984). The new institutionalism: organizational factors in political life, in the American Political Science
Review, Vol. 78, Nº 3, September, pp. 734-749.
MASSEY, Andrew (1997). In search of the state: markets, myths and paradigms,
in MASSEY, Andrew (Ed.), Globalization and marketization of government
services. Comparing contemporary public sector developments, University of Portsmouth Press.
NICKSON, Andrew (2002). Transferencia de políticas y reforma en la gestión
del sector publico en América Latina: el caso del New Public Management, en Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia, Nº 24, Octubre, Caracas.
NORTH, Douglas (1993). Instituciones, cambio institucional y desempeño económico. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
OSBORNE, D. and T. GAEBLER (1992). Reinventing Government: how the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, Mass:
Addison-Wesley.
PETERS, B. Guy (1997). Policy transfers between governments: the case of
administrative reforms, in West European Politics, Vol. 20, Nº 4, October, pp. 71-88.
PIERSON, Paul (1993). When effect became cause: policy feedback and political change, World Politics, Vol. 45, N° 4, July, pp. 595-628
POLLITT, Christopher (2001). Public management convergence: the useful
myth?, in Public Administration, Vol. 79, Nº 4, pp. 933-947.
POWELL, Walter and DIMAGGIO, Paul (eds.) (1991). The new institutionalism
in organizational analysis, University of Chicago Press.
RADAELLI, Claudio M. (2000). Policy Transfer in the European Union: Institutional Isomorphism as a Source of Legitimacy, in Governance: an international journal of policy and administration, Vol. 13, Nº 1, January,
pp. 25-43.
ROSE, R. (1993). Lesson-drawing in public policy: a guide to learning across
time and space. New Jersey: Chatham House.
SAHLIN-ANDERSSON, K. (2001). National, International and Transnational
Constructions of New Public Management, in CHRISTENSEN, Tom and
LAEIGREID, Per (dir.). New Public Management. The transformation of
ideas and practices, Ashgate.
SAINT-MARTIN, Denis (2000). Building the New Managerial State. Consultants and the Politics of Public Sector Reform in Comparative Perspective, Oxford University Press.
SIKKINK, Kathryn (1991). Ideas and institutions: developmentalism in Brazil
and Argentina. Ithaca, Cornell University Press.
SUREL, Yves (1995). Les politiques publiques comme paradigmes, dans
FAURE, A.; POLLET, B. et WARIN, Ph. (dir). La construction du sens dans
les politiques publiques, débats autour de la notion de référentiel. Paris,
LHarmattan.
WALKER, J. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states, American Political Science Review, 33, pp. 880-899.
WEYLAND, Kurt (2002). The diffusion of innovations: a theoretical analysis, Paper delivered to the 97th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.
WORLD BANK (1995). Bureaucrats in Business: the economics and politics of
government ownership, World Bank Research Report, Oxford University
Press.
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2015 Studia Politicæ
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
