Las actividades profesionales confiables: una herramienta para hacer operativo el concepto de competencia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22529/me.2020.5(1)08Palavras-chave:
educación basada en competencias, actividades profesionales confiables, supervisión, evaluación basada en el trabajoResumo
La educación de profesionales de la salud ha evolucionado de un enfoque con énfasis en la adquisición de contenidos a uno vinculado al alcance de resultados predeterminados, constituidos por el desarrollo de competencias por parte de los alumnos. En este contexto, surge el concepto de Actividades profesionales confiables (APROC) como una manera de vincular las competencias a la práctica profesional cotidiana y ofrecer una herramienta que permite operativizarlas facilitando la planificación de la enseñanza. El desarrollo gradual de la competencia implica que los alumnos requieren supervisión decreciente, constituyéndose la evaluación de la práctica en una herramienta fundamental para decidir qué tan apto se encuentra un estudiante para llevar adelante una tarea determinada en un contexto concreto y con qué grado de supervisión. Las APROCs ofrecen un modelo concreto de niveles de supervisión que permiten acompañar a los alumnos en el desarrollo de su autonomía minimizando los riesgos para los pacientes.Downloads
Referências
Flexner A. Medical Education in the United States and Canada. Washington, DC: Science and Health Publications, Inc.; 1910 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.32.810.41
Cooke M, Irby DM, O'Brien MC. Educating Physicians: A call for reform of medical school and residency. 1st Ed, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2010
Hodges B. Medical education and the maintenance of incompetence. Med Teach 2006; 28:690-6 https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590601102964
Fernandez N, Dory V, Ste-Marie LG, Chaput M, Charlin B, Boucher A. Varying conceptions of competence: an analysis of how health sciences educators define competence. Med Educ 2012; 46:357-365 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04183.x
Frank JR, Snell LS, Cate OT, Holmboe ES, Carraccio C, Swing SR, Harris P, Glasgow NJ, Campbell C, Dath D, Harden RM, Iobst W, Long DM, Mungroo R, Richardson DL, Sherbino J, Silver I, Taber S, Talbot M, Harris KA. Competency-based medical education: theory to practice. Med Teach. 2010; 32:63845. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2010.501190
Albanese M, Mejicano G, Mullan P, Kokotailo P, Gruppen L. Defining characteristics of educational competencies. Med Educ 2008; 42:248-55 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02996.x
Talbot M. Monkey see, monkey do: a critique of the competency model in graduate medical education. Med Educ. 2004; 38:587-92. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2004.01794.x
Grant J The incapacitating effects of competence: A critique. Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 1999; 4:271-277. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009845202352
Andolsek K, MedstarJP, Hauer KE, Edgar L, Holmboe E. Clinical Competency Committee Guidebook: a guidebook for programs. 2nd ed. Chicago: Acreditation Council for Graduate Medical Disponible Education: 2017. en: https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/ACGMECl inicalCompetencyCommitteeGuidebook.pdf. Acceso 6 dic 2019
Frank JR, Snell L, Sherbino J, editors. Can Meds 2015 Physician Competency Framework. Ottawa: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2015.
Ten Cate O. Entrustability of professional activities and competency-based training. Med Educ 2005; 39:1176-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02341.x
Ten Cate O, Scheele F. Competency-based postgraduate training: Can we bridge the gap between theory and clinical practice? Acad Med 2007; 82 (6): 542-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31805559c7
Obeso V, Brown D, Aiyer M, Barron B, Bull J, Carter T, Emery M, Gillespie C, Hormann M, Hyderi A, Lupi C, Schwartz M, Uthman M, Vasilevskis EE, Yingling S, Phillipi C, eds.; for Core EPAs for Entering Residency Pilot Program. Toolkits for the 13 Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2017. Disponible en aamc.org/initiatives/coreepas/publicationsand presentations. Acceso 6 dic 2019
Shaughnessy A, Sparks J, Cohen-Osher M, Goodell K, Sawin G, Gravel J. Entrustable Professional Activities in Family Medicine. J Grad Med Ed 2013; 5:112-118. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-12-00034.1
Chen HC, van den Broek WE, ten Cate O. The case for use of entrustable professional activities in undergraduate medical education. Acad Med 2015; 90:431-436. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000586
Taylor DR, Park YS, Egan R, Chan MK, Karpinski J, Touchie C, Snell LS, Tekian A. EQual, a novel rubric to evaluate entrustable professional activities for quality and structure. Acad Med. 2017;92: S110-S117 https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001908
Ten Cate O. Formación médica y evaluación basadas en las competencias: ¿de qué se trata y cómo puede relacionarse con la realidad de la práctica clínica?Rev Arg Cardiol 2011; 79:405- 408
Schuwirth LW, Van der Vleuten CP. Programmatic assessment: from assessment of learning to assessment for learning.Med Teach. 2011; 33:478-85 https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.565828
Ten Cate O. Entrustment as assessment: recognizing the ability, the right, and the duty to act. J Grad Med Edu 2016, 8: 261-262 https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-16-00097.1
Ten Cate O, Hart D, Ankel F, Busari J, Englander R, Glasgow N, et al. Entrustment decision-making in clinical training. Acad Med. 2016; 91:191-198 https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001044
