"Impact of Agricultural Trade with MERCOSUR on the State of Food Security in China"

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22529/

Keywords:

food security, soybeans, horizontal price transmission, international passthrough

Abstract

This paper aims to show that the exports of agricultural commodities from MERCOSUR countries to China has a significant effect in the state of food security in China. MERCOSUR countries have become key suppliers of several agricultural commodities for China, especially soybeans and beef. This suggests that MERCOSUR countries may have an important role in the provision of proteins to the Chinese population. We focus on two dimensions of food security in China: availability and access. We use lineal regression to show that the trade with MERCOSUR countries accounted for 8.2% of the total protein supply, or 10.42 grams per person per day, in mainland China, mainly due to trade in soybeans with Brazil. Then we use a cointegration model to prove that the international prices of soybeans are integrated across its main importers, China and the EU, and its main exporters, Brazil, the USA, and Argentina. This shows that there is stable connection between the international prices of this commodity, which has an effect on costs associated with food price stability policies in China. Finally, we use an IRF to find that Brazilian export prices of soybeans have a delayed and permanent effect on Chinese import prices of that commodity. A 1% increase in the soybeans exports price in Brazil can be expected to produce a 0.32% increase in the import price in China after one month and a 2.8% permanent rise after approximately 8 months. This findings will help inform policymakers and scholars in the field of food security and international trade in China and MERCOSUR.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barboza Martignone, G., Behrendt, K., & Paparas, D. (2022). Price transmission analysis of the international soybean market in a trade war context. Economies, 10(8), 203.

Coughlin, A., & Sutton-Vermeulen, D. (2020). The relationship between global soybean prices and local markets. CME Group. https://www.cmegroup.com/education/articles-and-reports/ relationship-between-global-soybean-prices.html

Fackler, P. L., & Goodwin, B. K. (2001). Spatial price analysis. In B. L. Gardner & G. C. Rausser (Eds.), Handbook of agricultural economics (Vol. 1, pp. 971–1024). Elsevier.

Guvheya, G., Mabaya, E. T., & Christy, R. D. (1998). Horticultural marketing in Zimbabwe: Margins, price transmission, and spatial market integration (Staff Paper No. SP 98-02). Cornell University.

Kenen, P. B., & Pack, C. (2008). Exchange rates, domestic prices and the adjustment process: A survey of recent evidence (Occasional Paper No. 1). Group of Thirty.

Kirchgässner, G., & Kübler, K. (1992). Symmetric or asymmetric price adjustments in the oil market: an empirical analysis of the relations between international and domestic prices in the Federal Republic of Germany, 1972–1989. Energy Economics, 14(3), 171–185.

Liu, T. Y., Su, C. W., Chang, H. L., & Xiong, D. P. (2018). Does the law of one price hold? A cross-regional study of China. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1), 592–606.

Machado, E. L., & Margarido, M. A. (2000). Seasonal price transmission in soybean international market: The case of Brazil and Argentina. Pesquisa & Debate, 12, 92–106.

Mafioletti, R. L. (2001). Formação de preços na cadeia agroindustrial da soja na década de 90. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, 39, 9–26.

Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of economics (8th ed.). Macmillan.

Miller, D. J., & Hayenga, M. L. (2001). Price cycles and asymmetric price transmission in the US pork market. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(3), 551-562.

Taylor, J. B. (2000). Low inflation, pass-through, and the pricing power of firms. European Economic Review, 44(7), 1389-1408.

Published

2025-10-01

How to Cite

Larre , G. A. ., & Gallardo, D. A. (2025). "Impact of Agricultural Trade with MERCOSUR on the State of Food Security in China". Studia Politicae, 64, 153-174. https://doi.org/10.22529/