The Evidence of the BelieverHans Joas´s Reading Max Scheler
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22529/Keywords:
evidence, believer, religion, feelingAbstract
In the present work, I would not like to evaluate whether Joas's interpretation of Scheler is relevant or fair, but rather go one step further. I seek to reflect on a central topic, which both Joas and Scheler address, for any believer: evidence. What is evidence for a believer? The approach of the present work, then, points out that the evidence in Scheler (2007), especially in On the Eternal in Man, has a religious character that goes beyond Husserl' (1967) epistemological approach to the concept of “evidence” in Logical Investigations. In fact, this is one of the topics that Joas values most in his interpretation of Max Scheler.Downloads
References
Anton Mlinar, I. M. (2014). La evidencia en los Prolegómenos y en las Investigaciones lógicas. Primeros aportes para una comprensión modal de la evidencia en Husserl. Investigaciones fenomenológicas, (11), 33-56. http://hdl.handle.net/11336/33900
Haffesbrink, H. (1931). Das Problem des Religiösen Gegenstandes bei Max Scheler. Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie, (8), 145-180.
Husserl, E. (1967). Investigaciones lógicas (vols. 1-2). Revista de Occidente.
Joas, H. (2020). Im Bannkreis der Freiheit. Religionstheorie nach Hegel und Nietzche. Suhrkamp.
Joas, H. (2024). El hechizo de la libertad. La teoría de la religión después de Hegel y Nietzsche. Sal Terrae.
Muñoz Pérez, E. V. (2023). Fenomenología y religión después de un siglo: un balance provisional. Erasmus. Revista para el Diálogo Intercultural, 25, 1-22. https://qellqasqa.com.ar/ojs/index.php/erasmus/article/view/680
Scheler, M. (2007). De lo eterno en el hombre. Ediciones Encuentro.
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Enrique V. Muñoz Pérez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
